EQE vs RS e-tron GT
Scores and specs side by side. The best value in each row is in bold and marked Best.
Main differences
- The EQE goes 30 mi further on the EPA cycle, 308 mi against 278 mi.
- The EQE is more efficient, 94 MPGe combined against 84.
- The EQE is rear-wheel drive; the RS e-tron GT is all-wheel drive.
Swipe for more Best best in the row |  Photo creditPhoto: Ethan Llamas, CC BY-SA 4.0 Mercedes Not yet scoredSpecs: 2026 Mercedes EQE 320+ |  Photo creditPhoto: Calreyn88, CC BY-SA 4.0 Audi Not yet scoredSpecs: 2027 Audi RS e-tron GT Performance |
|---|---|---|
Scores | ||
| Overall score | ||
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Charging | ||
| Performance & Handling | ||
| Comfort & Ride | ||
| Interior & Tech | ||
| Practicality | ||
| Value | ||
Range & efficiency | ||
| EPA range | 308 miBest | 278 mi |
| Efficiency | 356 Wh/miBest | 402 Wh/mi |
| MPGe combined | 94 MPGeBest | 84 MPGe |
Performance | ||
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
Dimensions & practicality | ||
| Body style | Sedan | Sedan |
