i4 vs Celestiq
Scores and specs side by side. The best value in each row is in bold and marked Best.
Main differences
- The Celestiq goes 52 mi further on the EPA cycle, 303 mi against 251 mi.
- The i4 is more efficient, 109 MPGe combined against 81.
- The i4 is rear-wheel drive; the Celestiq is all-wheel drive.
Swipe for more Best best in the row |  Photo creditPhoto: Wikisympathisant, CC BY-SA 4.0 BMW Not yet scoredSpecs: 2026 BMW i4 eDrive35 |  Photo creditPhoto: Mr.choppers, CC BY-SA 4.0 Cadillac Not yet scoredSpecs: 2026 Cadillac Celestiq |
|---|---|---|
Scores | ||
| Overall score | ||
| Range & Efficiency | ||
| Charging | ||
| Performance & Handling | ||
| Comfort & Ride | ||
| Interior & Tech | ||
| Practicality | ||
| Value | ||
Range & efficiency | ||
| EPA range | 251 mi | 303 miBest |
| Efficiency | 308 Wh/miBest | 417 Wh/mi |
| MPGe combined | 109 MPGeBest | 81 MPGe |
Performance | ||
| Drivetrain | Rear-wheel drive | All-wheel drive |
Dimensions & practicality | ||
| Body style | Sedan | Sedan |
.jpg){kind=link}